Ceci n'est pas une blog

  • rss
  • archive
  • Why do people have a Pavlovian response to the 90s as being "creatively bankrupt" when the 2000s gave us Ultimatum, One More Day and The Draco? Plus, people act like Liefeld defined the entire decade when his influence really ended in around 1994. I feel like the people who are the hardest on the 90s didn't bother to read much of it and just repeat what other people say. I'm still not defending Heroes Reborn, The Clone Saga or The Crossing though.
    Anonymous

    brevoortformspring:

    You can find good stuff and bad stuff in any period of publishing.

    But there was an awful lot of bad stuff in the 90s.

    And not a lot of good stuff.

    • September 30, 2014 (11:13 am)
    • 17 notes
    1. organastarkgaryen liked this
    2. gpack3 reblogged this from brevoortformspring
    3. corpuscarlosum liked this
    4. am1200 liked this
    5. unclesean liked this
    6. baumguy liked this
    7. omnimpotent reblogged this from brevoortformspring
    8. omnimpotent liked this
    9. nmrosario said: I lived through the 1990s and “creatively bankrupt” is pretty accurate and not just when talking about comic books.
    10. nmrosario liked this
    11. curiousmachinations reblogged this from brevoortformspring
    12. curiousmachinations liked this
    13. halcyonglaze liked this
    14. carlosjdrew liked this
    15. mattfromitaly liked this
    16. brevoortformspring posted this
© 2013–2023 Ceci n'est pas une blog